Striking down key provisions of the Children’s Internet Protection Act as unconstitutional, a special three-judge U.S. District Court panel in Philadelphia has ruled that Congress went too far when it threatened to pull certain federal funds from any public library that failed to install “filtering” software to block access to sexually explicit Web sites.

The judges found that the law runs afoul of the First Amendment because filtering software simply blocks too much and that mandating its use would therefore force libraries to censor the speech of millions of Internet speakers.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]