If you are a plaintiff, proving that some employment action was adverse is not always an easy task. And if you are the defendant, convincing a fact finder that the challenged action was not sufficiently adverse may at times be difficult. What then is an adverse employment action?

Both Title VII and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination prohibit retaliation against employees who oppose discriminatory employment practices. For example, Title VII makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee because that person “has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by [Title VII], or because [that person] has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing [under Title VII].” 42 U.S.C. 2000e-3(a).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]