Considerable logistical and procedural issues are involved when attempting to formulate efficient and manageable mechanisms for trying individual personal injury and property damage claims in a mass environmental contamination nonclass-action case.

A recent case illustrates this very well. On June 7, 2002, a partial jury verdict in the DuPont Pompton Lakes environmental case, Naftali, et al. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. PAS-L-364-98 (N.J. Super. Passaic Co.), awarded $380,000 plus lifetime medical monitoring to three individual plaintiffs determined by the jury to be injured by exposure to contamination from the former DuPont Pompton Lakes munitions plant.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]