“Good evening, Clarice,” Hannibal Lecter purrs in the greeting that ingratiated itself into popular culture. Deputy DA James Hammer didn’t invoke Lecter’s salutation in the trial against Marjorie Knoller and Robert Noel, of course. But he might have. Indeed, Lecter’s welcome in “The Silence of the Lambs” embodies the case for the prosecution.
For all their attention to trial technique, attorneys are notoriously resistant to substantive analyses of how litigation actually works. Understandably, lawyers — having long marketed themselves as masters of the fact-finding process — may be reluctant to reveal that they are in a different racket altogether. But trials don’t produce truth. Rather, courtroom battles respond to a more basic cultural need. The trial’s ritualized recounting of troubling events allows us to make sense of our lives — in essence, to determine meaning and context in the way civilized man appears always to have done: We organize facts according to what we know from familiar narrative formats; we draw conclusions based on the lessons of popular legend; we assuage our anxieties with story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]