X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

DECISION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION   Plaintiff, the United States of America (“the Government”), files its amended complaint against Defendants alleging violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq., (Counts I, II, III), common law fraud (Count IV), unjust enrichment (Count V), and payment by mistake (Count VI). ECF No. 48. The Government alleges that Defendants knowingly misrepresented that their company, Veteran Enterprises Company, Inc., (“VECO”), qualified as a service-disabled veteran owned small business (“SDVOSB”) in order to obtain and profit from construction contracts that were set aside for SDVOSBs. On January 31, 2018, this Court granted Defendants’ motions to dismiss the Government’s initial complaint but granted leave to amend. ECF No. 39; United States v. Strock, No. 15-CV- 0887-FPG, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15928, at *1 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2018). On October 29, 2018, the Government filed an amended complaint. ECF No. 48. On February 22, 2019, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint, and those motions are now before the Court. ECF Nos. 51, 52, 53, 54. For the reasons stated below, Defendants motions to dismiss are GRANTED. BACKGROUND I. The Establishment of VECO The Government alleges that, before establishing VECO, Defendant Lee Strock owned a construction company — Defendant Strock Contracting, Inc. — that participated in and received millions of dollars in contracts from a Small Business Administration (“SBA”) 8(a) program for companies owned by economically and socially disadvantaged individuals. ECF No. 48 28. But once Strock Contracting “graduated” from this 8(a) program, Strock could no longer use it to obtain federal contracts and began looking for other contracting opportunities. Id. 29. He found such an opportunity in SDVOSB programs established by the Small Business Act, the Veterans Benefits Act, and other federal laws which call for certain contracts to be set aside for SDVOSBs only. Id.

16-19; see generally PDS Consultants, Inc. v. United States, 907 F.3d 1345, 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (describing federal laws enacting SDVOSB programs). To qualify as an SDVOSB, a business must, among other things, be at least 51 percent owned by one or more service-disabled veteran(s) who must control the business’s day-to-day operations and make strategic policy and long-term decisions for the company. Id. 18, 26. Lee Strock decided to recruit a service-disabled veteran to a head a company that he could use to obtain SDVOSB contracts, since Strock himself was not a service-disabled veteran. Id. 30. To that end, in or around 2006, Strock met with Terry Anderson, whom he knew was a service-disabled veteran, to discuss the formation of an SDVOSB. Id. 31. As a result, VECO was formed with Anderson appointed as a “figurehead” President and 51 percent owner, Strock as Vice President and 30 percent owner, and Defendant Kenneth Carter as Secretary and 19 percent owner. Id. 32. Defendant Cynthia Golde, who, along with Carter also worked for Strock Contracting, was employed as VECO’s office manager. Id.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 25, 2024
Dubai

Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.


Learn More
April 29, 2024 - May 01, 2024
Aurora, CO

The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.


Learn More

Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...


Apply Now ›

Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...


Apply Now ›

Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›