By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Maltese, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Wendy Santacruz, appellant def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated August 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Roman, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Zachary Parker, ap — (S.C.I. No. 1170N/12) — Motion by the appellant to make the caption anonymous on an appeal from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated June 15, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Samuel Olabiyi, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision, order and certificate of this Court dated January 10, 2017, and the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 20, 2018, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated July 26, 2016, are amended by correcting the caption as set forth above; and it is further,ORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 20, 2018, is further amended by deleting from the first paragraph thereof the word “judgment” and substituting therefor the word “order.”SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Shivaun Williams, ap, v. Cassandra Bryson, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Cassandra Bryson, res, v. Shivaun Williams, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) V-8618-16) — Appeal by Shivaun Williams from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 4, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Donje Jones, ap, v. City of York res — Appeal by Donje Jones from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 14, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding on the ground that the appellant is not aggrieved by the order dated December 14, 2017 (see CPLR 5511), by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN, and LASALLE, JJ., concur.MATTER of D. (Anonymous). Elizabeth P. (Anonymous), petitioner-res, Darren M. (Anonymous), res-ap, Juan P. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Darren M. from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated July 7, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 9, 2018.MATTER of Honesty M. M. M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Taikeem L. W. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeals by Taikeem L. W. from two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, both dated January 25, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on April 5, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.MATTER of Kent Jacobs, res, v. Samuel Jacobs, Sr., ap — Appeal by Samuel Jacobs, Sr., from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated December 8, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated March 21, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Yasmin Daley Duncan386 Parkside AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11226866-565-3441By letter dated April 6, 2018, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order on certification of this Court dated March 21, 2018, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Ashley G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Jason A. T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Sharman E. S. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Amy G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-appellant; Eggar T. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent res — (Proceeding No. 1) N-20951-16, N-20952-16) — Appeal by Administration for Children’s Services from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 9, 2018.MATTER of Thomas A. Ledbetter, res, v. Woodlyne Singer, ap — V-4865-15) — Appeal by Woodlyne Singer from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 30, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Linda Stasi ap, v. 2muchstuff4me res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the appellants are not aggrieved by the order entered August 9, 2017 (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v. TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144, 148-148); and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Provident Funding Associates, L.P., res, v. Irene Miller appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 31, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., res, v. Bogdan Gierzynski, ap — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 21, 2017. Application by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Glenn Pines, ap, v. New York City Department of Education res — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 1, 2016, for poor person relief, to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record on appeal, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record or appendix on the appeal is denied with leave to renew by a motion made simultaneously with the perfection of the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Samuel Spradley, ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 127916) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Court of Claims dated March 6, 2017, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is granted, and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive payment of the filing fee and for free transcripts are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Markel C. (Anonymous). Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kwanza H. (Anonymous), res-res — Motion by the respondent-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 28, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Peter G. McKiernan, ap, v. Joseph Vaccaro, etc., def, Ernest Mancuso, Jr., res — 2017-11396Peter G. McKiernan, appellant,v Joseph Vaccaro, etc. respondents.(Index No. 796/14) Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 5, 2017, and August 21, 2017, respectively, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until April 25, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]).MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Roland Y. Perez, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 24, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Fabio E. Abreu, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 9, 2018, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr.The Legal Aid Society199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Robert Cruz, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 19, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr.The Legal Aid Society199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Ankhenaten Amen-Ra C. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc., petitioner-res, Adanna J. C. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res, Allan D. Shafter, etc. nonparty-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of D. (Anonymous), also know as Arjuna C. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc., petitioner-res, Adanna J. C. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res, Allan D. Shafter, etc. nonparty-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Judea J. C. (Anonymous). Forestdale, Inc., petitioner-res, Adanna J. C. (Anonymous), res-ap, et al., res, Allan D. Shafter, etc. nonparty-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeals by Adanna J. C. from three orders of the Family Court, Queens County, all dated January 29, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jennifer J. Valencia, res, v. Salvatore L. DiGilio, ap — Appeal by Salvatore L. DiGilio from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated February 13, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Julio A. Fernandez, res, v. Kymalyn Saunders, ap — Appeal by Kymalyn Saunders from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated February 16, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Rashmi Kumar Krishnaraj, ap, v. Ramesh L. Krishnaraj, res — V-25368-17, V-25368-17/18A) — Appeal by Rashmi Kumar Krishnaraj from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 5, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Kenneth Brown, ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 128172) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Court of Claims dated December 6, 2016, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is granted, and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive payment of the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted and the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Merchant Cash and Capital, LLC, plaintiff- res, v. Blueshyft, Inc. defendants- res, Mark Yosef, nonparty-ap — Motion by the nonparty-appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 9, 2017, and to enlarge the record to include certain documents.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the nonparty-appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is granted, the nonparty-appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 26, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kevin A. Mothersill, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered August 18, 2016, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal, by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before May 11, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2).CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Eric Krobath, etc., res, v. South Nassau Communities Hospital, etc., ap — Motion by Healthcare Association of New York State, Inc., for leave to file an amicus curiae brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the amicus curiae brief shall be served on the parties, and nine copies filed in this Court, on or before April 26, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no oral argument by the amicus curiae shall be permitted; and it is further,ORDERED that the parties, if they be so advised, may serve and file reply briefs to the amicus curiae brief within 10 days after service upon them of the amicus curiae brief.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Zefa Rudovic, ap, v. Luigi Rudovic res — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to strike the appellant’s appendix on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 20, 2017, on the grounds that it discloses identifying personal information, does not comply with the rules of this Court, and contains matter dehors the record, for an award of costs and an attorney’s fee, to impose a sanction upon the appellant and the appellant’s counsel, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Separate motion by Predrag Filipovic, an attorney in good standing in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to be admitted pro hac vice to represent the appellant on the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the respondent’s motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion by Predrag Filipovic and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the respondent’s motion which is to strike the appellant’s appendix is granted, the appellant’s appendix is stricken, and on or before May 11, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a replacement appendix that redacts social security numbers and bank account numbers, contains the missing pages of the trial transcript, and does not contain matter dehors the record; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the respondent’s motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 11, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent’s motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by Predrag Filipovic is granted.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Lehman Brothers Bank, plf, v. Cassandra Hickson respondents defendant; VVSI Corp., nonparty-ap — Motion by the respondents, inter alia, to strike the appellant’s appendix and the appellant’s brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 24, 2017, on the ground that they contain or refer to matter dehors the record, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief, and to impose a sanction upon the nonparty-appellant and its counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to strike the appellant’s appendix is granted to the extent that Volume II of the appellant’s appendix is stricken; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to strike the appellant’s brief is granted, the appellant’s brief is stricken, and on or before May 11, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a replacement brief that does not refer to the material in Volume II of the appellant’s appendix or other matter dehors the record; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 11, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Carole Palmieri, deceased. Patricia Palmieri, petitioner-appellant; Rosemary Bellinger, objectant-res — (File No. 1154/12) — Motion by the petitioner-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, dated February 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the petitioner-appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the petitioner-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Caitlin Barger, ap, v. Only Properties, LLC, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be grantedDILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Donna Grosvenor, plf-res, v. Frankie Santiago def-res, Fitzpatrick Neil St. Hill Dodson, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 29, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Zofia Sacha, ap, v. City of New York Health and Hospitals Corp. res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.NYCTL 2014-A plf-res, v. Quadrozzi Realty Corporation, ap, City of New York Environmental Control Board, et al., def-res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Roger Ravix res, v. Immacula Oligario, ap — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Exclusive Ambulette Service, Inc., ap, v. New York State Department of Health res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Bank of New York Mellon, etc., ap, v. Alberto Aquino res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 15, 2016, and May 22, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Wythe Berry, LLC, ap, v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 16, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 26, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Federal National Mortgage Association, res, v. Rudy E. Alverado appellants def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 17, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 23, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Pinkesz Mutual Holdings, LLC, ap, v. Edward Pinkesz, etc. defendants- res, Israel M. Kenig nonparty- res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Anonymous, etc., ap, v. Anna Zolonitskaya, etc., et al., res — 2017-10992Anonymous, etc., appellant,v Anna Zolonitskaya, etc.,et al., respondents.(Index No. 57683/16) Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 23, 2017, and August 24, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until May 11, 2018.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Judith Bandler, ap, v. Brian Bandler, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.JP Morgan Chase, etc., ap, v. Esther Twesky res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Annette Barone, ap, v. John L. Barone, res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 29, 2018.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ.Sophie Kapassakis, ap, v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al., respondents def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Michael Moran, ap, v. County of Suffolk res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 26, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Louis Grandelli, etc. plf-res, v. Hope Street Holdings, LLC def-res, Warner Electric Europe SAS, appellant def — Motion by the defendant-respondent LE Groupe Manufacturier, D’Ascenseurs Global Tardif, Inc., to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the movant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the movant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Phoenix Life Insurance Company, res, v. Town of Oyster Bay, ap — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Lebov, LLC, ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 121102) — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims, dated March 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 26, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Maspeth Federal Savings and Loan Association, ap, v. Rita Maruca, respondent def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., ap, v. John Coleman, etc., respondent def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Noel Soodeen appellants def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.MATTER of Lisa Strax, ap, v. City of New York res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 26, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until May 3, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Rivera, Austin and Lasalle, JJ.Denis Ibragimov ap, v. Town of North Hempstead, res — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 26, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Natalia Kolotova, ap, v. Beach Haven Apartments Associates, LLC res — Motion by the respondent City of New York to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 18, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time of the respondent City of New York to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 11, 2018, and the brief of the respondent City of New York shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Cohen and Barros, JJ.Patricia Rooney, res, v. Jonathan Garberg, def, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., ap — Motion by Paul V. Kaulas to be admitted pro hac vice to represent the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 3, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied with leave to renew upon proper papers, including a certificate of good standing from the bar of the state in which Paul V. Kaulas maintains his principal office for the practice of law (see 22 NYCRR 670.6[e]).AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.
