The Fourth Amendment does not bar a more exhaustive search of a child pornography suspect’s computer after he has already pleaded guilty to one crime and demanded the return of his property, nor does it require a new search warrant, a state appeals panel in Rochester has held.

In a case of apparent first impression, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, unanimously agreed that police were not only entitled to re-examine Stephen DeProspero’s computer before returning it, but were obligated to do so.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]