The state Supreme Court on Tuesday took up whether to adopt a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that sharply curtails trial judges’ power to enhance counsel fees in cases that might never have been filed but for fee-shifting rules.

In two cases, the Appellate Division slashed enhanced fees under Perdue v. Kenny A., 130 S. Ct. 1662 (2010), which held that a trial judge may award such fees only in rare and extraordinary circumstances and not “on an impressionistic basis.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]