The wireless industry is trying to block San Francisco’s novel cellphone “right to know” law on grounds it forces, not hinders, speech. The law would require retailers of cellphones to post signs and distribute information advising consumers of their potential health effects.

The suit is part of a new wave of litigation playing out in federal courts around the country in which corporations are using the compelled-speech doctrine to fight back as cities increasingly turn to health and safety disclosure laws, as opposed to piecemeal enforcement actions. The challenges come to disclosure laws aimed at anti-abortion pregnancy clinics, stores selling cigarettes and fast-food chains.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]