Jeffrey M. Lax contends that a Long Island cooperative rejected his application because they had developed a jaundiced attitude toward single men after a previous owner who was male and unmarried threw loud parties and smoked marijuana.
October 03, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A disappointed co-op buyer can proceed with his complaint that a Long Island cooperative discriminates against single men, a federal judge has ruled.
Jeffrey M. Lax contends that 29 Woodmere Boulevard Owners Inc. and related parties rejected his application to buy an apartment for $200,000 because they had developed a jaundiced attitude toward single men after a previous owner who was male and unmarried threw loud parties and smoked marijuana.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
