In reversing its own prior ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has found that the statements of an accused possessor of child pornography should be allowed into evidence.

The court reversed its 2009 decision in United States v. Plugh, 10-2815-cr, that the statements should be suppressed, after reviewing the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Berghuis v. Thompkins, —U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 2250.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]