In reversing its own prior ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has found that the statements of an accused possessor of child pornography should be allowed into evidence.

The court reversed its 2009 decision in United States v. Plugh, 10-2815-cr, that the statements should be suppressed, after reviewing the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Berghuis v. Thompkins, —U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 2250.