SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals today overturned a verdict in a beating case, finding a judge’s probe of a deadlocked jury and subsequent order of additional closing arguments to be an abuse of discretion.

The unanimous panel, noting that it was deciding a case of first impression for the circuit, said U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow of Arizona interfered with the jury’s role as sole fact-finder in a domestic-violence assault case out of Western Arizona. After the jury twice declared it was hopelessly deadlocked, the judge, over defense objections, asked jurors to reveal what had them deadlocked. The jury indicated it had issues with witness credibility and how the victim’s injuries were sustained.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]