Manhattan Civil Court Judge Arthur F. Engoron castigated attorney Steven R. Sutton last week for taking a grab-bag approach to defending a client, Gotham Lasik, against a lawsuit for payment of rent by its landlord, Cityspire. The judge granted Cityspire’s motion for summary judgment, ordering Gotham Lasik to pay more than $46,000 in back rent. He then criticized Sutton for offering 20 unavailing affirmative defenses.

“The grounds are a veritable laundry list, something of a ‘greatest hits,’ of what respondents tend to argue: the predicate notices are not self-authenticating; petitioner accepted a rent payment after serving a notice to cure; the amounts of money set forth in the predicate notices are inconsistent with the amounts set forth in the petition; the subject lease provision sets forth a condition subsequent rather than a conditional limitation; the premises are inaccurately described; the verification is improper; the mailings were improper; etc.,” the judge wrote. “In other words, we have the usual suspects, with, naturally, a few vague counterclaims thrown in for good measure.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]