May 19, 2011 at 05:22 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
SAN FRANCISCO — A plaintiff who developed a severe reaction to the drug Motrin can pursue a punitive damages claim against Johnson & Johnson and one of its subsidiaries after the California Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to review the case.
The court also decided against depublishing the court of appeal decision denying Johnson & Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandate in the failure-to-warn case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
