A state appellate panel has ordered a new trial for a man convicted of murder after a Queens judge failed to give a defense attorney any opportunity to discuss the judge’s answers to five jury notes.

A unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, Second Department, faulted Supreme Court Justice Michael Aloise for not following procedures set forth in Criminal Procedure Law 310.30 and case law that detail how communications from a jury should be handled during deliberations.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]