For Ballard Spahr, there was never much of a distinction between its equity and nonequity partner tiers, as both groups had the same voting rights and put capital into the firm. The only difference was that nonequity partners were paid a set income.

When that resulted in the nonequity tier doing better financially during the recession than the equity group, the firm decided to put all partners in the same situation of sharing in profit gains or losses.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]