Is there room in your universe for a different view of e-discovery than the one depicted by the Electronic Discovery Reference Model?

Shocking idea, isn’t it? I hold the EDRM in high regard. In fact, if I didn’t think of it as a rudder for e-discovery, I wouldn’t care. But I think that, when viewed from the perspective of plaintiffs counsel who is usually on the receiving end of e-discovery, the EDRM needs updating.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]