It could be a plot for a Hollywood thriller: A kindly man takes in a business colleague as a boarder. All is well until the house guest begins spying on him in compromising positions — and is found to harbor an unwelcome infatuation.

That scenario was all too real for the plaintiff in S.Z. v. M.C., A-3841-09, a case that tests whether the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act applies to people who live in the same house but are not related by blood or by romance.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]