Breaking and associated brands will be offline for scheduled maintenance Friday Feb. 26 9 PM US EST to Saturday Feb. 27 6 AM EST. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Microsoft scored a notable victory Wednesday in the war on so-called cybersquatters–the folks who set up websites with URLs that are just a typo or two different from those of popular sites. Seattle federal district court judge Ricardo Martinez issued a 9-page opinion allowing Microsoft to proceed with what he called “a novel cause of action for contributory cybersquatting.” Microsoft, represented by Mark Parris of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, filed suit last April against two companies, Digispace Solutions and yMultimedia, after they allegedly induced others to register domain names that allegedly included Microsoft trademarks or misspellings of some of Microsoft’s brand names. The URLs, with such names as, led users to sites where visitors who clicked on a link for MSN Messenger were sent to a site controlled by the companies or to “Smiley Central,” where they were asked if they wanted to download emoticon products. Cybersquatting is illegal under the federal Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act of 1999. But Microsoft wanted to take the law a step further, according to Judge Martinez, by asserting a novel theory of “contributory cybersquatting.” Microsoft and Orrick argued in an amended complaint that Digispace and yMultimedia “actively and intentionally induced others” to infringe and cybersquat on Microsoft trademarks by providing instruction on how to do so, purportedly as a way for squatters increase traffic to their own sites. Microsoft also asserted that Digispace and yMultimedia sold a software product that allowed buyers easily to set up sites that used Microsoft’s trademarks. The Microsoft complaint names not only the two companies and their founders, but also 50 John Doe defendants who, according to the complaint, were induced to infringe Microsoft copyrights. Digispace and yMultimedia’s lawyers, Derek Linke and Derek Newman of the IPboutique Newman & Newman, sought to dismiss Microsoft’s claims that Digispace and yMultimedia had induced violations of the federal anticybersquatting law. “No court has ever recognized a cause of action for inducement under the ACPA,” the defense contended in its motion to dismiss. “Similarly, no court has ever recognized a cause of action for induced trademark dilution. Both claims should be dismissed here.” Judge Martinez agreed that the contributory claim had “neither been explicitly addressed by an appellate court nor by statute.” But he said several federal district courts had at least discussed “the notional cause of action,” and ruled that it could proceed. He also allowed Microsoft to move forward on what he called a novel cause of contributory trademark dilution. While Judge Martinez said statutes and appellate courts had not addressed the issue, he said it “would be inconsistent with the Trademark Dilution Act to prohibit a cause of action for contributory dilution.” Orrick’s Parris referred our request for comment to Microsoft, which said in a statement that it’s pleased with Judge Martinez’s ruling. “As a company that invests in and values its relationships with its customers, including many families, we will not tolerate the deceptive and exploitative misuse of our protected trademarks,” said Bill Harmon, an associate general counsel in Microsoft’s digital crimes unit, in the statement. “We believe we have a responsibility to our customers to try to stop deceptive activity that threatens the safety and reliability of their online experience.” Linke told us his clients deny the allegations against them. Microsoft’s assertions “are not true,” he said, adding that Digispace is an advertising company, and its business has “nothing whatsoever to do with Microsoft.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.