Southern District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin held that the fashion company was entitled to assume its communications with employee Jonathan Moss were privileged as it discussed with him the alleged trademark infringement by Guess? Inc. and other companies.
January 06, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Gucci’s communications to and from its in-house lawyer are protected by the attorney-client privilege even though the lawyer was an inactive member of the California bar, a federal judge has ruled.
Southern District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin held that Gucci was entitled to assume its communications with Jonathan Moss were privileged as it discussed alleged trademark infringement by Guess Inc. and other companies.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
