Contesting defense claims that jailed financier R. Allen Stanford, accused of bilking investors out of $7 billion, is incompetent to stand trial, prosecutors are asking for a second opinion.
December 21, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Prosecutors are doubting claims by defense attorneys that jailed Texas financier R. Allen Stanford, accused of bilking investors out of $7 billion in a massive Ponzi scheme, is incompetent to stand trial and are asking a federal judge for a second opinion.
In a court motion filed Monday, prosecutors asked U.S. District Judge David Hittner to order that Stanford undergo a second competency exam.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
