Since the end of November, WikiLeaks has published hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables, representing the largest unauthorized release of contemporary classified information in world history. Many of the U.S. government documents were classified, either at the confidential or the secret level, meaning that their release is considered to pose a serious threat to national security.
How should Assange be treated under the law for what he spearheaded? What sort of a call would a judge make, in his role as judicial umpire, if a prosecution against Assange were pitched to him? As has been evidenced by the often-hyperbolic discussions of how to deal with Assange legally, prosecuting him under the Espionage Act (rather than, say, assassinating him, as some have suggested) may be the likeliest path — though a thorny path it would be. No easy balls or strikes here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]