Despite an attorney’s compliance with a new state requirement that lawyers verify information submitted in foreclosure documents, a Brooklyn judge has rejected a bank’s filings and an attorney affirmation after finding fault with underlying court papers.

Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Arthur M. Schack (See Profile) in Washington Mutual Bank v. Phillip, 16359-2008, said the foreclosure documents were incomplete and he faulted the attorney’s affirmation for relying on a two-year-old conversation with a bank representative.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]