Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Barr v. Galvin

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Before Boudin, Ripple, *fn1 and Selya, Circuit Judges.

In this appeal, the Secretary of State, on behalf of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, challenges the district court’s determination that Bob Barr and Wayne A. Root, the Libertarian Party’s candidates for president and vice-president in the 2008 general election, were entitled to have their names placed on the statewide ballot even though they had not submitted nomination papers as required by state law. While the particular election that gave rise to this controversy is over, the Secretary also challenges the district court’s related determinations that (i) the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, affords a right of substitution in the circumstances of this case and (ii) Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 53, § 14, which governs the substitution of certain classes of candidates on the ballot, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the substitution of non-party candidates for President and Vice-President of the United States.*fn2 Barr, Root, and the other appellees defend the district court’s resolution of these issues and, in doing so, argue that the result reached below was compelled by principles of constitutional law, statutory construction, and estoppel.

After careful consideration, we find that a live dispute remains. With respect to that dispute, we conclude that the Equal Protection Clause does not require the Commonwealth to afford a substitution mechanism applicable to non-party candidates. We further conclude that the relevant statute, while not unconstitutionally vague, is in need of interpretive clarification. Pursuant to principles of Pullman abstention, that interpretation should be effected by the Massachusetts courts. In light of this determination, the appellees’ claims concerning the Secretary’s prior pronouncements (including their estoppel claim) are either moot or likely to be rendered moot by the state courts’ interpretation of the statutory scheme. Accordingly, we reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center

Pennsylvania Legal Awards (PALA) 2023

June 14, 2023
Philadelphia, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.


Learn More

Consulting Top Consultants 2023

June 15, 2023
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.


Learn More

Southeastern Legal Awards (SLA) 2023

June 22, 2023
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts

INSURANCE COVERAGE ATTORNEY - NEW YORK


Farber, Brocks & Zane, LLP is seeking to add legal talent to its active and growing insurance coverage practice group. For our Garden Ci...


Apply Now ›

Litigation Associate - New York


4-6 Years Minimum Experience with General Liability defense, Property Damage, Labor Law defense. Must be admitted in NY and NJ. Trial experi...


Apply Now ›

Insurance Defense Associate Workers Compensation New York


Downtown AV-rated insurance defense law firm seeks an associate with 2 to 8 years of Workers Compensation insurance defense experience. Req...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs

SCHIRMER LAW LLC

06/09/2023
DBR Web

SCHIRMER LAW LLC Celebrating 7 years of Excellent Service


View Announcement ›

POND LEHOCKY STERN GIORDANO

06/06/2023
TLI Web

Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP would like to announce that....


View Announcement ›

HARTMANN DOHERTY ROSA BERMAN & BULBULIA LLC

06/05/2023
NJLJ Web

HARTMANN DOHERTY ROSA BERMAN & BULBULIA LLC's Matrimonial & Family Practice Warmly Welcomes the Honorable Peter J. Melchionne (Ret.) to Lead its New Family Law Dispute Resolution Team.


View Announcement ›
Go to Professional Announcements

Legal Newswire

Sekhar Bahadur joins SEDA Experts Investment Banking and Private Equity Expert ...
Winning Strategies: Anna Osipov’s Journey to Establishing Osipov Legal Group L...
IMS Consulting & Expert Services Acquires Nationally Recognized Tsongas Litigati...
CHAMBERS USA 2023 RANKS SOUTHBANK LEGAL AMONG THE TOP BANDS FOR COMMERCIAL LITI...
Submit a press release