Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The expected litigation frenzy against mortgage lenders that used “robo-signing” tactics — mass signing and approval of foreclosure documents without verification — has launched, with class actions in Florida and Maine and a lawsuit by Ohio’s attorney general filed this month, all against GMAC Mortgage. Other purported class actions involving robo-signing have been filed in federal courts in Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland and New Jersey in recent weeks. Lawyers expect many more to follow. Gary Mason, a partner at Washington-based Mason LLC who filed a purported class action in the Middle District of Florida, predicts that there will be a multidistrict litigation. “I’m quite certain that there will be enough lawsuits,” Mason said. “Courts are realizing that this has infected the integrity of the judicial system and are more sympathetic to homeowners who are challenging the foreclosure proceedings,” Mason said. The suit he filed, Huber v. GMAC LLC, claims that GMAC engaged in “systematically fabricating evidence in the form of fraudulent affidavits” in Florida foreclosure proceedings. The plaintiffs want the court to declare the affidavits null and void. Geoffrey Huber and three other plaintiffs are named in the suit, filed on Nov. 4. Although he’s sure there will be more cases, Mason said “it’s difficult to predict how a wrongful foreclosure action is going to fare.” The cases seem to be trying on different legal claims, he said. The legal claims in the Huber case include violation of constitutional rights under color of law, abuse of process, violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and unclean hands. “I don’t think there’s much precedent for many of the causes of action being alleged, particularly not in the context of a class action,” Mason said. The lawsuit in Maine, Archibald v. GMAC Mortgage was first filed in state court then transferred to the District of Maine on Nov. 4. Steven Archibald and five other named plaintiffs sued GMAC for “submitting false representations” regarding foreclosure actions in Maine’s state and federal courts. The plaintiffs claim GMAC employees never fully read the affidavits and certifications they signed. The Archibald plaintiffs claim that “robo-signing should lead to cancellation of any summary judgment or any other kind of judgment that was based on a false and fraudulent affidavit,” said Charles Delbaum, a staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center. The center is co-lead counsel on the case. The legal claims in the Archibald case include violations of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act, abuse of process, fraud on the court and breach of good faith and fair dealing. The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary and final injunction against GMAC foreclosures in Maine. They also want the court to order the company to meet the legal requirements for future filings of mortgage paperwork. “We’re not contending the process couldn’t be done again if in fact the paperwork is available,” Delbaum said. Ohio’s attorney general, Richard Cordray, has also gotten in on the act. He filed State of Ohio v. GMAC Mortgage in state court, and it was removed to the Northern District of Ohio on Nov. 5. The lawsuit claims that GMAC, its parent company Ally Financial and GMAC Mortgage foreclosure team leader Jeffrey Stephan committed fraud by signing and causing the filing of “hundreds of false affidavits and assignment of notes,” in Ohio courts. Cordray is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction against GMAC and Ally to stop them from finishing foreclosures with faulty affidavits. He is also seeking actual damages for consumers: civil penalties of $25,000 for each violation of the state sales law, plus punitive damages. “These so-called ‘robo-signed’ affidavits disrespect the courts and the private property rights of homeowners,” stated Cordray, in a press release about the lawsuit. “As we seek to uncover the extent to which GMAC used such tactics, we are taking this action…to make sure that these faulty affidavits are no longer used in foreclosure proceedings.” Lawyers for GMAC either referred questions to the company or did not respond to requests for comment. Ally Financial also did not respond to requests for comment. Sheri Qualters can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.