Last week, when we reported on a threat letter to Bank of America from a formidable group of bondholders assembled by Gibbs & Bruns and on Quinn Emanuel being hired to investigate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s potential claims against issuers of residential mortgage-backed securities, we talked about hurricane warnings. It’s time to upgrade, folks. We may be looking at a Category 5 gale hitting big banks and Wall Street issuers before this is all over.
On Wednesday, bondholder counsel David Grais of Grais & Ellsworth and lawyer-turned-bondholder-wrangler Talcott Franklin of the Investor Clearing House held a conference for residential mortgage-backed securities investors. (Here’s a webcast, courtesy of Grais & Ellsworth.) Every one of the 100 seats in the room was taken, Grais told us, as was each of the 250 telephone lines into the live webcast. Bondholders who bought securities backed by badly underwritten or deficiently serviced mortgages are evidently mad as hell and trying to figure out how to minimize their losses.
But it’s not going to be easy, as Bethany McLean reported this week at Slate (and Financial Times blogger Tracy Alloway has been reporting for months). Bondholders must jump through a series of procedural hoops just to get to litigation–as two trusts suing Bank of America recently learned the hard way–and then must figure out what kind of suit makes the most sense.
To get a better grip on the paths this litigation is likely to travel, we spent a good bit of time on the phone with David Grais, whom we once called “The Splashiest Plaintiffs Lawyer in the Mortgage-Backed Securities Game.” Grais has been at this a while; he represents two of the five Federal Home Loan Bank Boards that have filed state-court securities cases against RMBS issuers, and he was on the losing end of the trusts’ case against Bank of America. His insights answered a lot of our questions.
First off, Grais warned that there’s a big leap between disgruntled bondholders and plaintiffs. Even bondholders who’ve petitioned trustees to investigate mortgage-backed securities or signed notices of deficiency are sometimes reluctant to sue banks and Wall Street firms, often because they’re fearful that the banks will them cut them off. “We’re in the early stages of devising a structure to permit investors to participate anonymously,” he said.
Next is the question of what type of suit to file. Grais favor state-law securities suits by individual bondholders, such as those he’s filed on behalf of Charles Schwab and the Federal Home Loan Banks of Seattle and San Francisco. State blue-sky laws don’t require a showing of fraudulent intent, Grais explained, and typically require issuers to make investors whole through issuer buy-backs. The problem with state securities claims, though, is that not every investor can bring them, depending on when and how their bonds were purchased. There are also statute of limitations issues.
That leaves two other types of suits, Grais said, both of which are based on alleged issuer failures. The first are buy-back or put-back claims, in which investors assert issuers didn’t meet contractual underwriting standards in assembling the mortgages that backed the securities they offered. (As Kathy Patrick of Gibbs & Bruns noted last week, by asserting breach of contract instead of securities fraud, bondholders avoid having to prove intent.)
Bondholders can also assert claims based on issuers’ alleged pooling and servicing failures after the securities were sold. Conduct that impairs the value of the bonds in violation of pooling and servicing contracts (such as robo-signing foreclosure documents) could support such a suit.
The key hurdle for both buy-back and servicing claims is that both require big coalitions of bondholders. To bring a suit, investors must have the support of 25 percent of the voting rights in the issuing trust.
Grais told us he doesn’t favor buy-back suits, not only because of the 25 percent hurdle, but because any recovery accrues to the trust, and not necessarily to the bondholders who filed the suit. (Their particular recovery depends on their standing in the trust.) He’s hesitant about pooling and servicing suits, he said, because servicing agreements between issuers and investors don’t typically specify damages for violations.
Grais said that he hopes to see some megacases–like the one the Gibbs & Bruns coalition appears to be contemplating (Grais said that group seems to be asserting both underwriting and pooling and servicing violations)–but that it’s likelier that the investor outreach he and Franklin of the Investor Clearing House are conducting “will spawn lots of smaller cases.”
Either way, we can’t wait to see what happens next.
Presented by BigVoodoo
More from ALM
From Lex Machina
Data is power in today’s world. This article outlines how your firm can take advantage of key, in-depth data to track findings and resolutions in case law to help you develop your litigation strategy.
From Lex Machina
Learn how Legal Analytics enables you to better select qualified and cost-efficient outside counsel, to quickly assess opposing counsel, and to drive effective data-backed litigation strategy.
From Lex Machina
In this on-demand webinar, learn how Legal Analytics helps your firm onboard the best talent, respond to overnight RFPs, create competitive Alternative Fee Arrangements, and more.
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
Our Team Account subscription service are for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both option are priced the same.
From Data to Decisions
Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends.
Exclusive Depth and Reach.
Legal Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.
Big Pictures and Fine Details
Legal Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.
International Private Client Forum 2018
November 15, 2018 - November 17, 2018
The annual meeting place for international private client lawyers.
The British Legal Awards 2018
November 29, 2018
The British Legal Awards serve as a showcase for the achievements of one of the UK's most successful sectors.
The British Legal Awards 2018
November 29, 2018
Celebrating achievement, excellence and innovation in the legal profession.
Sponsored by: Burford Capital | March 05, 2018
[ON-DEMAND] Learn about financing structures and pricing and how it helps firms remain competitive.
Sponsored by Burford Capital | December 07, 2017
[ON-DEMAND] Join this webcast to learn what’s driving the five-fold growth of litigation finance and how it can improve your firm’s profitability.
Sponsored by RVM Enterprises Inc. | November 16, 2017
[ON-DEMAND] Join this webcast to receive an overview of the latest trends and uses for analytics in eDiscovery.
Central New Jersey, New Jersey, United States
Central New Jersey law firm seeks NJ licensed attorney with 3-7 years experienced in litigation, property tax appeals and land use & develop...Apply Now ›
Corporate Associate Attorney
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Our client, an Am Law 200 law firm, is seeking a corporate associate to join its growing Pittsburgh office. Our client’s preference is...Apply Now ›
Top global biopharmaceutical company seeks 5+ year attorney with in-house or law firm experience advising commercial stage pharmaceutical or...Apply Now ›
NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN ANNOUNCESView Announcement ›
FISHER POTTER HODAS
Fisher Potter Hodas is Building a Better firm.View Announcement ›
LESNEVICH & MARZANO-LESNEVICH
Congratulations Madeline Marzano-Lesnevich, Esq. on your incredibly successful year November 2017-2018View Announcement ›
ALM Legal Publication Newsletters
Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.
As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.
Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.