A Texas appellate ruling interpreting the "equal inference rule" will allow an unusual breach-of-fiduciary-duty suit against Cox Smith Matthews and a former shareholder to go to trial.
November 01, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
An opinion by San Antonio’s 4th Court of Appeals interpreting the “equal inference rule” will allow an unusual breach-of-fiduciary-duty suit against Cox Smith Matthews and a former shareholder to go to trial.
In the state court litigation, a former Cox Smith client alleges its lawyer Renee McElhaney “lied” to induce the client to settle a federal tort case for $4.5 million.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
