An appeal aimed at the New Jersey Supreme Court has the potential to markedly alter the state process for commencing disciplinary cases against lawyers, by challenging the authority of district ethics committees to refuse to docket grievances without recourse for the rejected parties.
October 29, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
An appeal aimed at the New Jersey Supreme Court has the potential to markedly alter the process for commencing disciplinary cases against lawyers.
The underlying suit challenges the authority of district ethics committees to refuse to docket grievances without recourse for the rejected parties.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
