A constitutionally invalid search warrant does not mean that evidence seized from the home of an admitted child pornographer should be excluded, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday.

Efrain J. Rosa had argued that an overbroad search warrant that did not mention the criminal activity police were aiming at was so plainly defective that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule under the Fourth Amendment should not apply.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]