Getting inked is protected speech, and a Southern California coastal city’s blanket ban on tattoo parlors is unconstitutional, an appeals panel has found.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in an opinion published Thursday had no trouble deeming tattoos and the business of tattoo parlors forms of pure expression fully protected by the First Amendment, which it notes conflicts with the findings in at least six previous cases from various jurisdictions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]