A California appeals court has kicked out a lawsuit arising from Whole Foods Market Inc.‘s aversion to foie gras.

Reversing a trial court, the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled that a poultry supplier with ties to the delicacy’s production failed to establish that a lawsuit against subsidiaries of Whole Foods belonged in California. The court found on Aug. 18 that the Whole Foods subsidiaries lacked sufficient ties to the state to require them to defend a lawsuit there. The appeals court directed the lower court to grant Whole Foods’ motion to quash service of summons by the plaintiff, Grimaud Farms of California Inc.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]