In a class action’s sixth time before the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, the court ruled in an unpublished opinion last month that class action treatment is warranted in a case alleging that H&R Block Inc. abused its confidential relationships with class members by not informing them that their “Rapid Refunds” were in fact bank loans.

Defendant H&R Block is seeking reargument before the en banc Superior Court and for the opinion to be published as a citable opinion, said the company’s counsel, William H. Lamb of Lamb McErlane in West Chester, Pa.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]