A securities fraud suit against insurance giant Aetna Inc. fell flat on Wednesday when a federal appeals court refused to revive claims by investors who said the company made false statements about its “disciplined” pricing strategies that were designed to drive up the stock price so that three top executives could cash in and sell $61 million in stock.

The unanimous three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that all of the allegedly misleading statements were protected by the “safe harbor” in securities law because they amounted to nothing more than “forward-looking” statements that were accompanied by “meaningful cautionary” statements that put investors on notice of the risk.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]