Lawyers for the estate of the woman shot to death in the Middlesex courthouse parking lot in 2005 are fighting to get a full picture of what two top judges knew — or didn’t know — about the courthouse’s security situation.

But the Judicial Branch is resisting the full disclosure process of discovery, invoking the doctrine of sovereign immunity, and only agreeing to provide information through tightly-controlled answers to written questions, or “interrogatories.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]