One side calls a case going before a state appeal court this week an “ordinary fee dispute,” while the other insists it raises issues about contingency agreements and arbitration that no court has ever addressed.
At the very least, the case involves millions of dollars in attorney fees and a novel agreement based not on the client’s recovery of damages, but on the estimated damages the client might suffer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
