It didn’t take long for California defense lawyers to take the new honest services precedent out for a spin.

In remanding a conviction against former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling, the U.S. Supreme Court held last month that the “honest services” provision of the wire fraud statute is too vague. It should only apply to cases involving bribery or kickbacks, wrote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (pdf).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]