A federal appeals court has ruled that a lower court should not have dismissed a charge that an avowed white supremacist used his website to urge others to harm the foreman of a jury that convicted another white supremacist, Matthew Hale, of soliciting a federal judge's murder. The 7th Circuit said Monday that William White's Web post falls outside First Amendment protections.
June 30, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A federal appeals court has ruled that a lower court should not have dismissed a charge that an avowed Virginia white supremacist used his website to urge others to harm a juror.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago said Monday that William White’s website post falls outside the protection of the First Amendment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
