Those e-mail messages offering good credit rates from several seemingly independent sources? They might be annoying, but they’re not illegal.
That’s what the California Supreme Court said in a ruling released Monday (pdf).
Those e-mail messages offering good credit rates from several seemingly independent sources? They might be annoying, but they're not illegal, a unanimous California Supreme Court has ruled. "An e-mail with an accurate and traceable domain name," the opinion stated, "makes no affirmative representation or statement of fact that is false," even if the messages were intended to bypass spam filters. The plaintiff sued Vonage Holdings Corp. over messages -- headed by such names as urgrtquikz.com -- that offered broadband telephone services.
June 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Those e-mail messages offering good credit rates from several seemingly independent sources? They might be annoying, but they’re not illegal.
That’s what the California Supreme Court said in a ruling released Monday (pdf).
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS