A New York lawyer who represented clients in a New Jersey real estate case without crossing the Hudson is nonetheless subject to New Jersey’s jurisdiction in a legal malpractice suit, a state appeals court said Monday.

Overturning a judge below who “relied almost exclusively on the absence of credible evidence of defendant’s physical presence in New Jersey,” the Appellate Division said personal jurisdiction was warranted because the lawyer was hired to stop a pending New Jersey foreclosure action, pertaining to four properties in the state, which provided sufficient minimum contacts.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]