X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The battle between Becker & Poliakoff and a former associate over $2,000 in back pay appears to be over. Becker and former associate Richard Valuntas agreed to settle their Palm Beach, Fla., small claims court dispute last weekend. Neither side would reveal the settlement terms. A trial had been set to start Tuesday. “It has been resolved presumably satisfactorily to both parties,” firm managing partner Alan Becker said in a statement Monday. Valuntas said: “It has been amicably resolved. That’s all I’m going to say.” The case is over after months of depositions and an estimated $100,000-plus in legal fees. Valuntas, an associate at Rosenbaum Mollengarden Janssen & Siracusa in West Palm Beach, sued Becker last August, alleging the firm committed breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation by refusing to repay him the 12 percent deducted from his paycheck for several months in an associate pay holdback program. He also claimed the involuntary pay deferral program violated his employment contract and the firm’s policy manual. Alan Becker announced the deferrals in a podcast in May 2008, saying they affected all lawyers. It turned out partners’ salary deferral was 4 percent, with partners missing one or more paychecks. During the litigation, Valuntas lambasted Becker for allegedly refusing to tap into the firm’s line of credit and instead “taking an interest free loan off the backs of its associates.” But Becker said the firm was not obligated to repay associates who were “disloyal” and left the firm. “I don’t care if they’re angry,” Becker said previously. Valuntas “thinks he’s entitled to $2,000, and we think he’s entitled to nothing.” Valuntas declined to state whether his attorney fees would be paid by Becker under the settlement. Valuntas was represented by Ethan Wayne of Gonzalez & Garcia in West Palm Beach, and Becker initially was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and later by its own attorneys after the Rothstein firm collapsed. While other lawyers complained about the enforced salary deferrals, Valuntas was the only one to sue his former firm. Becker said at the time that the deferrals were necessary to avoid layoffs. The pay cuts were temporary, and lawyers who stayed at the firm were repaid, he said. Valuntas left in August 2008, the same month the salary deferrals ended.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.