Less than a week after handing the Justice Department a big defeat over warrantless wiretaps, Jon Eisenberg was battling Tuesday to scrape together a victory in a California case involving lawyer advertising.

The Oakland appellate specialist was bombarded during oral arguments in the California Supreme Court with questions skeptical of his position that attorneys’ ads constitute commercial speech that isn’t protected by the state’s anti-SLAPP statute.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]