The state’s highest court Tuesday refused to recognize the doctrine of primary assumption of risk as a defense against liability for injuries suffered during youthful “frolic” or “horseplay.”

Ruling on an issue that had divided Appellate Division courts, the Court of Appeals concluded in Trupia v. Lake George Central School District, 53, that the defense should be used only to further the public policy goal of encouraging participation in sports and other recreational activities.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]