The attorney-client privilege protects notes and memorandums that Sidley Austin wrote while investigating alleged sexual abuse by a music teacher, a federal appeals court said on Tuesday.

In an opinion issued Tuesday, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that handwritten notes and memorandums relating to interviews produced by Sidley Austin lawyers in the course of their investigation are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine, even though the lawyers weren’t handling the lawsuit that sparked the investigation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]