The U.K. Court of Appeal handed down its judgment Thursday in the high-profile libel battle between science writer Dr. Simon Singh and the British Chiropractic Association, in what will be viewed as a victory for free speech campaigners. The judgment backed the appeal of Singh against a controversial High Court ruling that the BCA could proceed with its libel claim against Singh for a 2008 article that claimed the body "happily promotes bogus treatments."
April 02, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The U.K. Court of Appeal handed down its judgment Thursday in the high-profile libel battle between science writer Dr. Simon Singh and the British Chiropractic Association, in what will be viewed as a victory for free speech campaigners.
The judgment backed the appeal of Singh against a controversial High Court ruling from Mr Justice Eady that the BCA could proceed with its libel claim against Singh for a 2008 article that claimed the body “happily promotes bogus treatments.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
