After taking a mulligan, lawyers at Howrey scored a victory Monday for Titleist in a golf ball patent fight. Following a weeklong retrial, a Delaware jury found that Acushnet, owner of the Titleist brand, does not infringe on golf ball patents held by rival Callaway Golf. Persuaded by San Francisco Howrey partner Henry Bunsow's arguments, the jury decided that Callaway's four patents on a multilayered golf ball were invalid because of anticipation and obviousness.
March 30, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
After taking a mulligan, lawyers at Howrey scored a victory Monday for Titleist in a golf ball patent fight.
Following a weeklong retrial, a Delaware jury found that Acushnet Co., owner of the Titleist brand, does not infringe on golf ball patents held by rival Callaway Golf Co. Persuaded by San Francisco Howrey partner Henry Bunsow’s arguments, the jury decided that Callaway’s four patents on a multilayered golf ball were invalid because of anticipation and obviousness.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
