Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

He argued he was harmed by an antitrust scheme that he exposed. But a federal appeals court said he wasn’t a victim.

On Monday, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said no to a Michigan executive who was allegedly fired for refusing to participate in a market allocation conspiracy by the packaged-ice industry. He blew the whistle on the conspiracy several years ago and has since allegedly been blackballed by the ice industry. The court ruled that, despite the man’s employment troubles — he doesn’t have a job — he does not qualify as a victim under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.