In a dispute between a Poughkeepsie, N.Y., man who sent his vintage Camaro to Pennsylvania for the installation of custom parts and the repairmen who allegedly took the car apart and failed to put it back together, a Brooklyn appellate panel has ruled that the repair shop’s “thoroughly passive” Web site does not, on its own, constitute grounds for personal jurisdiction in New York over the shop’s owner.

“If a Web site provides information, permits access to e-mail communication, describes the goods or services offered, downloads a printed order form, or allows online sales with the use of a credit card, and sales are, in fact, made, then the assertion of personal jurisdiction may be reasonable,” Justice Thomas A. Dickerson wrote for the unanimous panel in Grimaldi v. Guinn, 959/08.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]