Are $127 million and some oversight provisions enough to placate Judge Jed Rakoff? Last September, Rakoff ferociously rejected a proposed settlement agreement under which Bank of America would have paid $33 million fines to settle a Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit charging the bank with failing to notify shareholders that Merrill Lynch, which BofA purchased under pressure in late 2008, was going to pay as much as $5.8 billion in employee bonuses in early 2009.

Rakoff dismissed the proposed $33 million settlement as “trivial” and “absurd,” and wondered why the bank — and ultimately its shareholders — should pay the fine instead of the individual executives who committed the alleged disclosure violations. He even raised the possibility that BofA’s outside counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz might deserve some punishment.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]