A case that came to light earlier this month highlights a type of dispute that rarely makes it to trial and one firms rarely want publicized. Drinker Biddle & Reath won a $1.78 million verdict against a former client late last year after the client disputed the alternative fee arrangement the two sides agreed to in a patent litigation matter. "Suing a client is not a decision Drinker ever takes lightly and it did not do so in this case," said an attorney representing Drinker Biddle.
January 21, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Drinker Biddle & Reath won a $1.78 million verdict against a former client late last year after the client disputed the alternative fee arrangement the two sides agreed to in a patent litigation matter.
Details of the case, Drinker Biddle & Reath v. AgriZap Inc., came to light earlier this month and highlight a type of dispute that rarely makes it to trial and one firms rarely want publicized.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
