Drinker Biddle & Reath won a $1.78 million verdict against a former client late last year after the client disputed the alternative fee arrangement the two sides agreed to in a patent litigation matter.

Details of the case, Drinker Biddle & Reath v. AgriZap Inc., came to light earlier this month and highlight a type of dispute that rarely makes it to trial and one firms rarely want publicized.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]