Several former Iranian properties in Washington, D.C., are not being used exclusively for diplomatic purposes and should therefore be allowed to be confiscated to satisfy a civil judgment stemming from a suit that alleges Iran’s support of terrorism, a lawyer for a bombing victim argued Friday in a federal appeals court.

The lawyer, John Vail, senior litigating counsel for the Center for Constitutional Litigation in Washington, argued that the federal government’s periodic rental of the property — including Iran’s former embassy and the ambassador’s residence — has ended the diplomatic use of the real estate. Vail argued Friday before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]